LiDAR vs Photogrammetry: Which Is Better for Handheld 3D Scanning?
Handheld 3D scanner vs photogrammetry — accuracy, cost, speed, and real-world use cases compared. Find out which method fits your project.
Read More →
360° Non-Repetitive Scanning 3D LiDAR
M360 3D LiDAR Sensor for AGV, AMR & Mobile Robots
360° Non-Repetitive Scanning 3D LiDAR
Innovative non-repetitive scanning technology captures richer spatial information per frame. Combined with high-precision ranging and industrial-grade reliability, providing comprehensive 3D perception for autonomous driving, robot navigation, and smart cities.
360°
200kHz
50m
IP67
<4.5W
Scroll Down
Core Advantages
Core Advantages
Four core technologies for superior 3D perception
Non-Repetitive Scanning
Each rotation covers different angles, progressively filling the vertical field of view over time for higher spatial resolution and richer environmental data.
FOV 70°×360°High-Precision Perception
200kHz point rate, 0.05~50m range (90% reflectivity), ≤2cm accuracy (@10m) for reliable environmental modeling and target detection.
Resolution 0.9°~0.18°Industrial-Grade Protection
IP67 rated, -10°C~+60°C wide temperature range for harsh outdoor environments. Only 408g, compact and lightweight.
Only 408gLow Power Design
Power under 4.5W with built-in IMU. Supports PTP v2 precise time synchronization for convenient multi-sensor fusion.
PTP v2
Technical Specifications
Technical Specifications
M360 and M360-D dual versions for diverse application needs
| Spec | M360 | M360-D |
|---|---|---|
| Scanning Type | Non-repetitive | Non-repetitive |
| Horizontal FOV | 360° | 360° |
| Vertical FOV | -10°~60° (70°) | -10°~60° (70°) |
| Range | 0.05~50m (90% reflectivity) | 0.05~50m (90% reflectivity) |
| Point Rate | 200kHz | 200kHz |
| Range Accuracy | ≤2cm(@10m) | ≤2cm(@10m) |
| Angular Resolution | H: 0.9°~0.18°, V: 0.36° | H: 0.9°~0.18°, V: 0.36° |
| Return Mode | Single Return | Dual Return |
| Protection | IP67 | IP67 |
| Input Voltage | 12~32VDC | 12~32VDC |
| Power | <4.5W | <4.5W |
| Dimensions | 78×78×81mm | 78×78×81mm |
| Weight | 408g | 408g |
| Interface | Ethernet×1, CAN×1 | Ethernet×1, CAN×1 |
| Protocol | TCP/UDP, PTP v2 | TCP/UDP, PTP v2 |
Application Scenarios
Applications
Discover M360 real-world applications across industries
Handheld LiDAR Scanners for Scan-to-BIM: Complete Workflow Guide
Learn how to use handheld LiDAR scanners for scan-to-BIM workflows — from hardware selection and field scanning to point cloud processing in Revit. Practical guide with accuracy benchmarks.
Read More →How to Choose a LiDAR Sensor for a Handheld 3D Scanner
A robotics engineer's guide to selecting the right LiDAR for handheld SLAM scanning — comparing Livox M360, LD19, Pandar40P, and mechanical multi-line options.
Read More →FAST-LIO2 vs R3LIVE vs Point-LIO: Which SLAM Algorithm Fits Your Handheld Scanner?
Compare three HKU-MARS SLAM algorithms for handheld scanning. Which handles fast motion, degraded environments, and colored point clouds best?
Read More →What Sensors Does an Autonomous Forklift Need? A Complete Breakdown
A practical breakdown of every sensor type an autonomous forklift requires — LiDAR, cameras, ultrasonics, IMUs, and encoders — with comparison tables and a selection checklist.
Read More →AGV LiDAR Comparison Matrix 2026: 12 Sensors Tested
Side-by-side specs for 12 LiDAR sensors used in AGVs and AMRs — 2D and 3D, from budget options to industrial-grade. Includes decision framework by use case.
Read More →RoboSense Q1 Robot LiDAR Shipments Surged 1,458%
185,500 robot LiDAR units shipped in Q1 2026. Why pricing is compressing, and what this means for AGV sensor selection.
Read More →How to Choose the Right LiDAR for AGV Fleets: A Data-Driven Selection Framework
A data-driven framework covering 8 hardware parameters, SLAM compatibility, a 3-year TCO model, and a 15-point evaluation checklist for AGV LiDAR selection.
Read More →The Real Cost of LiDAR on Your Robot Fleet: A TCO Breakdown
Why the cheapest AGV LiDAR could cost you 5x more. Our 3-year TCO model reveals downtime, calibration, and hidden costs that spec sheets don't show.
Read More →How to Upgrade Your AMR Fleet from 2D to 3D LiDAR: A Complete Migration Guide
A practical migration guide covering sensor selection, ROI analysis, and step-by-step deployment for switching your AMR fleet to 3D LiDAR. Includes M360, RoboSense Airy, and Hesai JT128 comparison.
Read More →AGV LiDAR Near-Blind Zone: Is 5cm Enough? 6 Sensors Compared
Compare near-blind zone specs of 6 leading LiDAR sensors: M360, MID-360, Hesai XT32, Hokuyo, SICK, and Livox Mid-70. Includes measured data, decision tree, and ISO 3691-4 safety analysis.
Read More →AGV/AMR LiDAR Selection Guide (2026): How to Pick the Right Sensor
Blind zone, FOV, IP rating, dual echo — practical LiDAR selection recommendations for warehouse, factory, and outdoor AGVs.
Read More →2D vs 3D LiDAR: Should Your Robot Upgrade? A Practical Guide
How big are 2D LiDAR blind zones really? Which scenarios justify upgrading to 3D? Cost analysis based on real deployments.
Read More →"Eyes" in Urban Renewal: How M360 LiDAR Solves Survey Challenges
How M360 LiDAR is applied in urban renewal to solve traditional survey challenges, improve mapping efficiency and reduce costs.
Read More →Measure What You See: M360 LiDAR for High-Precision Industrial Scanning
M360 LiDAR in industrial scanning: factory renovation, warehouse modeling, and equipment maintenance for high-precision measurement.
Read More →Substation Inspection: How M360 LiDAR Solves Quadruped Robot Stair-Climbing
Real-world substation inspection: M360 LiDAR solves quadruped robot navigation on 40° steep stairs with 5cm near-blind zone, IP67, and dual-echo penetration.
Read More →After Buying 20+ LiDARs: My Selection Checklist
M360 vs MID-360 comparison: range, blind zone, FOV, power, supply, dual-echo, IP67, IMU with scenario-based recommendations.
Read More →Multi-Device Interference: How M360 LiDAR Solves It
M360 LiDAR anti-interference for multi-device environments: dual-echo penetration, 5cm near-blind zone, IP67 protection.
Read More →Six Months with Campus Delivery Robots: 3D LiDAR Lessons
SmartBotParts M360 vs Livox MID-360 on campus delivery robots: 70° FOV low-profile mount, 5cm near-blind zone, cold/hot temp, dual-echo rain.
Read More →One LiDAR, Five SLAM Algorithms Benchmarked
M360 benchmarked with FAST-LIO2, LIO-SAM, Point-LIO, RT-LOAM, Cartographer: mapping quality, CPU usage, best-fit scenarios.
Read More →Humanoid Robot LiDAR: Head or Waist Mount?
LiDAR mounting for humanoid robots: head vs waist. M360 70° FOV, IP67, dual-echo performance in waist-mount config.
Read More →Outdoor Logistics: Why It's Harder Than Indoor
Indoor AGV pitfalls outdoors: rain noise, high temp power loss, dust. M360 dual-echo rain resistance, 60°C operating temp, IP67 dust protection.
Read More →
Video Showcase
Video Overview
See M360 product performance and applications in action
Coming Soon
Coming Soon
Coming Soon